By A Web Design

The Cyprus Deal is Already Under Threat (Of Course)





Walter Crane Pandora Opens The Box 1892

One day after it was agreed on and announced by the Eurogroup and Cyprus president Nicos Anastasiades, the deal that would turn the Eurozone into a Pandora's box like no other EU measure to date has done looks like it may never reach the finish line. The Cypriot parliament, in which freshly elected Anastasiades holds just 20 of 56 seats, has pushed a vote on the deal forward until Monday, a clear sign that the president's political adversaries will not easily be locked into an agreement that is obviously and for good reason hugely unpopular.

As I wrote yesterday in Bank Run In Cyprus; Who's Next?, this very curious looking deal has the potential to kill off confidence in the EU banking sector practically overnight. If bank deposits in Cyprus are not guaranteed (even if only up to a maximum), there is no reason for people in other Eurozone countries to trust their deposits will be treated any differently. In Cyprus, if the deal is voted through parliament, depositors will lose between 6.75% and 9.99% of their money, but there is nothing to keep the EU/IMF/ECB troika from imposing 20% or 40% (or you name it cuts) on deposits in Italy, Spain, France, take your pick.

There are reports that Anastasiades accepted the "agreement" because Germany made it a do or die deal, but that still doesn't explain why Berlin would take such an obvious risk with the entire EU banking sector. Although I have to admit the risk apparently wasn't recognized yesterday by 95% or more of the international press, so you might be tempted to believe that neither Germany nor the rest of the Eurogroup saw it either. But that would be excessively stupid. And incompetent as they are, even I don't think they're that far gone.

I would think it's more likely that the 37% of deposits in Cyprus banks that are "foreign", i.e. largely Russian, have pushed European politicians into a crowdpleasing mode - punish the criminals! - that made them overlook broader consequences. But, really, that doesn't totally convince me either. Though I was greatly amused to read that Britain will compensate the 3500 troops it has stationed on Cyprus that have bank accounts there.

Still, when you see things happening that seem this far out of field, there's often an ulterior motive behind them. Like if the Eurogroup counted all along on Cyprus not accepting the terms of the deal forced upon it. Or Anastasiades counting on the fact that the deal would never be ratified by parliament.

Meanwhile, I'm curious to know who the Cypriot politicians on all sides of the aisle are talking to today. And yes, Beppe Grillo comes to mind again, Niall Farage perhaps. Who else can they expect any support from?

More tomorrow (the vote coincides with a national carnival holiday) and Tuesday. Let’s be clear on one thing in the meantime: the deal as it is on the table is an unmitigated disaster for Europe, and the effects will spill to at least the rest of the western world. At the same time, if Cyprus says no, the implied threat is that Europe will let it fall like a stone, bankrupt the banks, and throw it out of the Eurozone.

And that would be the end of the Eurozone; if Cyprus leaves, so will others. Are they really going to take that risk after 5 years, 500 emergency meetings and €5 trillion in bailouts? Hell no, you kidding?, but they still threaten to do it, and in such a transparent fashion? Why would Anastasiades, or anyone else for that matter, fall for that? Something doesn't add up here.


 

Posted: 1 month, 4 weeks ago by p01 #6949
Makes sense. The bank runs have happened (stealthily) long time ago, people don't have any money anymore (neither do the banks), so the next logical step is clearly bank closures. The extend & pretend & issue more debt has only masked the normal steps towards full blown Unprecedented Mother of All Depressions, but has not stopped its march behind the curtain.
Liquidations and bank closures next.
Posted: 1 month, 4 weeks ago by jal #6948
Keep a close eye on what happens here next because if the only remaining "good" Cypriot bank is shuttered, then the entire European bailout package, cobbled in the last hours of Sunday, goes poof.


www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-26/cyprus-last-remaining-big-bank-set-unexpected-liquidation

Is Cyprus' Last Remaining Big Bank Set For An Unexpected Liquidation?
Posted: 2 months ago by Professorlocknload #6947
I'll grant that this Cyprus mess might have been sparked by some sort of misguided strategy, ie; my posit that the incompetents that triggered it wanted to attempt to churn velocity.

But at this point I'd suggest it has turned into an out of control wildfire. I believe the process of throwing the lessor entities to the wolves has begun in spades.

Disintegration of the Euro is gaining speed now, add the complication of geopolitical posturing between Russia, China and the US. That spells Proxy War. What more convenient place to conduct that than Europe? Already have all the maps from the last two, and the US economy could use the boost, no? And Putin needs a popularity makeover at home.

A European Spring might be next up.

After observing the events of the last week, I'd get liquid and physical. If it isn't real and in your hands, you don't own it. Someone at ZH mentioned money in a bank account isn't yours, it's really an investment in the bank, like shares.

When one thinks about that, it makes sense. They re-lend it and share some of the interest with you, in return for your taking the risk with them. Now, is 0.10% an adequate risk premium in light of the present state of affairs?

All this FDIC stuff is propaganda, left over from the last confidence restoration campaign. It's already been reduced to $250 k per depositor, from $250k per account, in any given institution. What do that say to ya?

And, the best made plans...and planners...
Posted: 2 months ago by p01 #6946
C'mon, jal! Those guys can't plan a piss-up in a brewery, they can only dictate when things get dicey, and the diktat recipe is well known and tried.
And frankly, there's nothing else they can do, because what happens, really, is that there's no more capital. It has been spent & burned & evaporated. Everyone talking about capital controls misses the point that there's nothing (or not much) to control anymore.
That's all.
Posted: 2 months ago by jal #6945
What is happening has been planned.

Its a troika experiment.

Now we get to see what happens when the central banks do the right thing and don't start up the printing press.

The objective is to get a default and gather the data from the resulting chaos.

All doomers should pay attention.

Coming To a Town Near You

Keep watching. Keep gathering your own data.

www.zerohedge.com/news/2013-03-25/word-out-place-sends-europe-tumbling

A Word Out Of Place Sends Europe Tumbling

"Cyprus a Template For EU"
Posted: 2 months ago by p01 #6944
Can't run on a bank when you either don't have anything to withdraw, or you don't have anything to withdraw anymore, or ummm.... when you can't withdraw what you don't have anymore. Problem solved.

Now, only the stock market finally crashing might spook the masses into paying attention to the fact that they don't have anything anymore.

And the stock market finally crumbles. Watch out.
Posted: 2 months ago by gurusid #6943
Hi Folks,

Its all over now:

Sky News:
Deposits above 100,000 euros (£85,000) in the Bank of Cyprus will be hit with a levy of "around 30%" under the EU bailout deal, a government official has confirmed.

Spokesman Christos Stylianides told state radio that the charge would be paid as the second largest Greek Cypriot lender is destined to be wound up.

However Russia, which is the source of many large uninsured Cypriot accounts worth up to 20bn euros (£17bn), reacted angrily on Monday to the levy news.

"The stealing of what has already been stolen continues," Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev was quoted by news agencies as telling a meeting of government officials.

A spokesman for President Vladimir Putin added that the president has asked the government to restructure a 2.5bn euro (£2.13bn) loan to southern Cyprus.

Russian news agencies quoted Mr Putin's spokesman, Dmitry Peskov, as saying that the president has instructed the government to work out the terms for restructuring the loan, which was made 2011.

The island's last-minute deal to secure a 10bn euro (£8.5bn) EU and International Monetary Fund (IMF) approved bailout by eurozone ministers, saved the country from a banking system bankruptcy and eurozone departure.

Key markets across Europe, excluding Italy, reacted positively in midday trading.

The second-largest bank, Popular Bank of Cyprus - known as Laiki - will effectively be shut down and split into a "good bank" and a "bad bank".

Sub-100,000-euro deposits in Laiki will be safeguarded and transferred to the Bank of Cyprus, the so-called "good bank", while those above the 100,000-euro limit, which under EU law are not insured, will be frozen and hit with the levy of around 30% to resolve the debt crisis.

The move will yield some 4.2bn euros (£3.6bn) overall - the bulk of the 5.8bn euros (£4.9bn) Cyprus needed to raise as part of the bailout conditions.
etc.

Everything coming up roses olives! Looks like Russia got the boot - 30% ow! ..."because I used to love her but its all over now":


L,
Sid.
Posted: 2 months ago by Glennjeff #6931
The resullts of democratic votes in Greece and Italy are clearly showing movement in an antiestablishment / antiausterity direction.

The collectivist beaurocrats may be using Cyprus as an example of what will happen if the general electorate attempts widespread rejection of central management.

As always, just a thought.

Austerity is not an avoidable outcome given resource depletion, still folks do like to live in denial. Giving every buffoon the right to vote was always a flawed idea anyway, how can democracy possibly function when the vast majority of folks don't have a clue. On the other end of the big slapping stick, people who stand up and say my plan is the correct one, follow me, have a good probability of being psychopath variants.

Outcome remains assured, collapse and die off. Only the derivative is uncertain.

Have a nice day:)
Posted: 2 months ago by william #6923
Just like to point out that some of the most conservative advice I am hearing about Europe is this is fast becoming one big dictatorship. Should expect something big within days. You piece together what he is saying and develop your own opinion.

Posted: 2 months ago by Alexander Ac #6913
Latest from deflationist Gary Shilling:

"The last meaningful episode of deflation was in the 1930s. That’s also the last time the U.S. was truly at peace. Deflation is a peacetime phenomenon." HUH?

But read the whole piece...

www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-03-20/why-global-economies-face-an-age-of-deflation.html

Alex
Posted: 2 months ago by gurusid #6907
Hi Dave,

You got the geopolitics right:



ECB gives Cyprus bailout ultimatum, banks face cutoff
By Michele Kambas and Paul Carrel | Reuters. 21/03/2013

NICOSIA/FRANKFURT (Reuters) - The European Central Bank gave Cyprus until Monday to raise billions of euros to clinch an international bailout or face losing emergency funds for its banks and inevitable collapse.

The ultimatum came with the island's leaders locked in talks on a "Plan B" to try to raise 5.8 billion euros demanded by the EU under a 10 billion euro (8.56 billion pounds) rescue, after angry lawmakers threw out a tax on deposits as "bank robbery".

Officials said new options discussed on Thursday could include nationalising pension funds of semi-state companies, issuing an emergency bond linked to future natural gas revenue or a revised bank deposit levy hitting only large investors, many of them Russians.

The European Central Bank, which has kept Cyprus's banks operating with a liquidity lifeline, said the government had until Monday to get a deal in place, or funds would be cut off.

"Thereafter, Emergency Liquidity Assistance (ELA) could only be considered if an EU/IMF programme is in place that would ensure the solvency of the concerned banks," it said.

Cyprus's central bank governor said he expected to clinch a financial support package by then. He did not say how.

The government has ordered banks to stay closed until Tuesday. The stock exchange also suspended trading for the rest of the week.

There were long queues at some bank branches in Nicosia as staff replenished cash machines, which have continued to operate while banks have been closed since last week.

In Moscow, Cypriot Finance Minister Michael Sarris said he was discussing possible Russian investments in the island's banks and energy resources to reduce its debt burden, as well as an extension of an existing 2.5-billion-euro Russian loan.

Russian citizens have billions of euros to lose in the island's outsized, teetering banking sector.


Dijsselbloem said new loans from Russia would anyway not solve the debt issue, and that a revised levy on larger bank deposits was still on the table.

"I'm not sure that this package is completely gone and failed, because I don't see many alternatives," he told the European Parliament in Brussels.

EU officials believe at least some of the 5.8 billion they are demanding should come from the 68 billion euros in Cypriot banks, 38 billion of which are in the form of large deposits of more than 100,000 euros, mainly from foreigners.

But hitting small savers caused visceral outrage, and the Cypriot government fears that foisting too big a burden on large depositors would wreck the offshore financial industry that forms much of the country's economy.

Among the other options, nationalising pension funds of semi-public companies could yield between 2 billion and 3 billion euros, although European officials say it would raise less. Issuing bonds linked to future natural gas revenue is problematic because pumping any gas is years away.

INSOLVENCY

Doubts about the fate of the small nation of just 1.1 million people has shaken confidence in the single-currency euro zone and raised geopolitical tension between the EU and Russia.

Russian Prime Minister Dmitry Medvedev, who meets a European Commission delegation in Moscow on Thursday, said the bloc had behaved "like a bull in a china shop". He likened EU proposals, which would force Russian customers to contribute to the rescue of Cypriot banks, to Soviet-era expropriations.

Tuesday's parliamentary vote marked a stunning rejection of the kind of strict austerity accepted over the past three years by crisis-hit Greece, Portugal, Ireland, Spain and Italy.

European officials maintained the pressure on Nicosia.

"I cannot rule out a Cyprus insolvency," Austrian Finance Minister Maria Fekter said in an interview with the newspaper Oesterreich. "A euro exit would not achieve anything. Cyprus must act now."

With Cypriot Energy Minister George Lakkotrypis also in Moscow, officially for a tourism exhibition, speculation was rife that access to untapped offshore gas reserves could be on the table as part of a deal for Russian aid.

Cyprus is a haven for billions of euros squirreled abroad by Russian businesses and individuals - one of the reasons why Germany and other northern euro zone states are reluctant to bail it out without a contribution from bank depositors.

The island's banking sector was hollowed out by its exposure to bigger neighbour Greece.

The proposed levy on deposits would have taken nearly 10 percent from accounts over 100,000 euros. Smaller accounts would also have been hit, although the government proposed softening the blow to spare savers with less than 20,000 euros.

Cypriots were enraged at the proposal to tax accounts with less than 100,000 euros, which are meant to be protected by state guarantees across the European Union.

Marinos Panaretou, a 36-year-old retail manager, said he had been withdrawing the maximum 500 euros every day since Saturday, when news broke of the proposed levy.

"People feel safer if we have cash on us because you don't know what you're going to wake up to," he said. "Quite simply, you don't know what's going to happen tomorrow."

European officials say the Cypriot government could have protected small savers if it imposed a higher tax on big deposits, but it refused to do so to protect the rich foreign clients of its offshore banking business.

EU leaders are growing increasingly exasperated with Cyprus, while the threat of bankruptcy for a member of the euro zone, however small, raises fears for confidence in the currency.

"There is no obligation to accept help," said Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski, whose country does not use the euro. "Cyprus has the possibility of living with its own mistakes."


Reading between the lines, it looks like Russia is making a play on any gas resources off the shores of its old Soviet ally Syria, which interestingly is going through its own 'democratic' struggle. Maybe it likes the idea of total hegemonic control of all of the EU's gas supplies... Even if its 'years away'.

As for a military base, the UK has prior historical claim there



It is interesting how debt played a part in this back then as well:


Suffice to say the island has been a hot bed of geopolitics throughout the last century, and regardless of of its EU membership or not, will no doubt continue to be.

L,
Sid.

>>>>>

Latest via sky news:
Posted: 2 months ago by p01 #6905
Alexander Ac wrote:
And most of them does not have savings, rather debt, I suppose, so why bother taking away few bucks from the wealthy?

Bravo, Alex!
To wit, here's your average person's bank run capability:
www.statisticbrain.com/american-family-financial-statistics/
I can't find any statistics for EU (Cyprus), but I doubt they're any better.

Sometimes I really wonder about this disconnect from reality.
Posted: 2 months ago by Gravity #6904
Gravity's Constant:
[ 0 ≠ 0 ]

Gravity's Law:
[ 0 = 0 ] on average.

Gravity is a recursive algorithm.
It really is.
Posted: 2 months ago by alan2102 #6901
gurusid wrote:
if its things like gold, be prepared to give it up or do hard time:
[url=http://www.the-privateer.com/1933-gold-confiscation.html]
The Gold Confiscation Of April 5, 1933



Boy, if there were ever a time NOT to worry about gold confiscation, (but rather to worry about everything-else confiscation), it is NOW.
Posted: 2 months ago by gurusid #6900
Hi GO,


Gold Confiscation

Is your point do not own gold because it can be confiscated, or to own nothing because it can be confiscated?

Should we all dispose of everything we own and walk naked on a pair of sandals and pray the swill don't take our sandals from us, or is it just the Gold they have brainwashed you into hating..??


Non of the above - did you even read the post?

Get it while you can, that is hard assets that will be useful. The best hard asset IMHO is to gain as much skill and knowledge (how to garden/mend/make/repair sustainably etc) that will enable you and others to live as independently and sustainably as possible in the future. Have you read Orlov? What does he say?
Get out of the system, have as little to do with it as possible
or words to that effect. Also be flexible, all of what you suggested is a possible good investment (excepting the paper/digital stuff) but it is not a panacea. No one knows for sure what is going to go down, especially as regards the local situation. All that can be said for certain is that we will have to live more sustainably in the long run. I thought that this message was implicit on this site, but my assumptions appear to be wrong. The old industrial consumerist exploitation model is dead in the stagnating lifeless water that it has created. So why not start now? Be the change you want to see...

L,
Sid.
Posted: 2 months ago by Golden Oxen #6899
Gold Confiscation

Is your point do not own gold because it can be confiscated, or to own nothing because it can be confiscated?

Should we all dispose of everything we own and walk naked on a pair of sandals and pray the swill don't take our sandals from us, or is it just the Gold they have brainwashed you into hating..??
Posted: 2 months ago by davefairtex #6898
skip -

Its a nice theory, but it will founder on the rocks of international geopolitics. Russia appears to be shopping for naval bases in the Mediterranean, and if Cyprus leaves the eurozone and readopts its Pound, Russia underwriting that Pound would seem like a natural way for them to support all that KGB money AND obtain a nice base in a sunny climate.

That doesn't even take into account any of the petroleum resources thought to be hiding under the seabed nearby the island.
Posted: 2 months ago by skipbreakfast #6897
I'm going back to what I insisted on in much older TAE comments all along. The first country to leave the Eurozone will be made to suffer and stand as a horrifying example of the ramifications of exit. The pain will be exacerbated by the Troika--they will underhandedly fan the flames, though in such a way that it doesn't appear that way. The media will jump on the bandwagon with video footage of babies being born in abandoned hospitals, empty grocery store shelves, violence in the absence of a police force. It will be mayhem. And Greece et al. will be fairly warned: take our offer or suffer the same fate.

I thought Greece would be the first to exit and be made the example. But many pointed out that the Euro can't really AFFORD, financially, for Greece to exit. They can, however, financially at least, afford a Cyprus exit. So Cyprus will be our horrifying example.

Here the Troika apparently gave Cyprus a choice that they knew Cyprus would probably not accept. If Cyprus accepts, that's a bonus. If it doesn't, they have their example.

There will be blood. And it will make Mario Draghi smile. Just what the doctor ordered.
Posted: 2 months ago by gurusid #6896
Hi GO,

When was the last time you tried to withdraw a large amount of cash? Its no that easy; oh, they'll give you a 'check' or a bankers draft or a BACS transfer, but hard cash? And that' assuming that the people selling
Gold, silver, stocks, reits, real estate, art, farmland, diamonds, hidden cash, commodity funds, oil drilling partnerships, natural gas mlps, junk bonds, corporate bonds, soverign debt.
will take cash, or for that matter 1s & 0s in their bank account. This is where Stoneliegh's 'claims to underlying wealth' starts to kick in, get it while you can,, but make sure its a hard asset, and not more 1s & 0s in some bank computer vault... And then if its things like gold, be prepared to give it up or do hard time:

The Gold Confiscation Of April 5, 1933
From: President of the United States Franklin Delano Roosevelt
To: The United States Congress
Dated: 5 April, 1933
Presidential Executive Order 6102

Forbidding the Hoarding of Gold Coin, Gold Bullion and Gold Certificates By virtue of the authority vested in me by Section 5(b) of the Act of October 6, 1917, as amended by Section 2 of the Act of March 9, 1933, entitled

An Act to provide relief in the existing national emergency in banking, and for other purposes~',

in which amendatory Act Congress declared that a serious emergency exists,

I, Franklin D. Roosevelt, President of the United States of America, do declare that said national emergency still continues to exist and pursuant to said section to do hereby prohibit the hoarding gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates within the continental United States by individuals, partnerships, associations and corporations and hereby prescribe the following regulations for carrying out the purposes of the order:

Section 1. For the purpose of this regulation, the term 'hoarding" means the withdrawal and withholding of gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates from the recognized and customary channels of trade. The term "person" means any individual, partnership, association or corporation.

Section 2. All persons are hereby required to deliver on or before May 1, 1933, to a Federal Reserve bank or a branch or agency thereof or to any member bank of the Federal Reserve System all gold coin, gold bullion, and gold certificates now owned by them or coming into their ownership on or before April 28, 1933, except the following:

(a) Such amount of gold as may be required for legitimate and customary use in industry, profession or art within a reasonable time, including gold prior to refining and stocks of gold in reasonable amounts for the usual trade requirements of owners mining and refining such gold.

(b) Gold coin and gold certificates in an amount not exceeding in the aggregate $100.00 belonging to any one person; and gold coins having recognized special value to collectors of rare and unusual coins.

(c) Gold coin and bullion earmarked or held in trust for a recognized foreign government or foreign central bank or the Bank for International Settlements.

(d) Gold coin and bullion licensed for the other proper transactions (not involving hoarding) including gold coin and gold bullion imported for the re-export or held pending action on applications for export license.
etc.

L,
Sid.
Posted: 2 months ago by Golden Oxen #6895
There are plenty of places to run too.

Gold, silver, stocks, reits, real estate, art, farmland, diamonds, hidden cash, commodity funds, oil drilling partnerships, natural gas mlps, junk bonds, corporate bonds, soverign debt.

None without some risk of course, but if you feel your funds are going to be confiscated anyway, the risk becomes less, or more tolerable. Perhaps that's the plan??
Posted: 2 months ago by gurusid #6893
Hi Folks,

The Prof almost had it:
They might imagine all that cash coming out of the negative interest accounts world wide now. As a bank run starts small, then exponentially expands, so does a run on where to spend the proceeds, while they are still worth anything.


Where does one run to? For a start there is nowhere near enough hard cash for people to start hoarding that; about 3% if your lucky of the worlds wealth is in that form. No most of those lovely digital bits of 'wealth' have nowhere else to go but into some other digital storage facility. They got you by the one and two zeros so to speak...

L,
Sid.
Posted: 2 months ago by p01 #6892
Mother Russia had banned foreign banks from opening branches just before the rash fiasco with Cyprus, were some Russian money was universally known to quietly reside:
www.itar-tass.com/en/c32/677099.html

Posted: 2 months ago by Professorlocknload #6891
I'm with Steve from V on one point, maybe a couple of others as well. Stagnant hoardings, as attempts to preserve a modicum of assets, kill money velocity, the only thing preventing the Keynesian dream progressing toward it's point of destruction, into the dust bin with Wiemar.

They might imagine all that cash coming out of the negative interest accounts world wide now. As a bank run starts small, then exponentially expands, so does a run on where to spend the proceeds, while they are still worth anything.

This could very well be an attempt to light a fire under the reluctant consumer. Ill advised, it only serves to scare the horses further, but par for econ savvy impaired micro managers of a government controlled capitalism (fascism). The same logic that builds empty cities in China and proposes a $20 an hour minimum wage. Sure, driving up the cost of productivity will create more jobs, right? I mean, just mandate that struggling small businesses pay $200 an hour and we'll all drive Hummers. Gas will stay the same price though, yes?

Accomplishing this transition from savings to spending through the slow steady process of debasement was getting the manipulators nowhere. They were only able to stay slightly behind the rate of de-leveraging with their print fest. Admin costs (non productive elements) skim off too much of the newly created loot. They might be finally realizing it takes ever more money creation just to stay in the same place.

Of course, getting through to the anointed is like attempting to get building permits, " I have a customer that would like to build a...'NO!' Wait, just hear me out, he would bring jobs...'NO!' May I speak to your supervi...'NO! Is there any way to...'NO!' "

Mish has a nice piece on the positives of all this up. globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2013/03/from-smoldering-ashes-comes-good-news.html

Seems there is an ever growing chasm developing between the managers and the managed in our twisted system where the non productive rule over the producers, the latter demanding more and more supervision (protection?) be imposed on themselves as things deteriorate. Diminishing returns, maybe?

Other than swap meets and individual transactions at local community levels, we've never really given free market capitalism a chance, because it can't thrive in captivity, just as Chanterelle mushrooms can't.

I believe the day will come, as faith in complex institutions disintegrates, we will have no choice but to embrace the concept again, when the discomfort becomes like a rock in the shoe for enough folks, resulting in their ignoring the ranting and flailing of the controllers, as they stand on the side of the road with their hands out.
Posted: 2 months ago by bluebird #6890
3/19/13
The National Government are pushing a Cyprus-style solution to bank failure in New Zealand which will see small depositors lose some of their savings to fund big bank bailouts, the Green Party said today.

Open Bank Resolution (OBR) is Finance Minister Bill English’s favoured option dealing with a major bank failure. If a bank fails under OBR, all depositors will have their savings reduced overnight to fund the bank’s bail out.

“Bill English is proposing a Cyprus-style solution for managing bank failure here in New Zealand – a solution that will see small depositors lose some of their savings to fund big bank bailouts,” said Green Party Co-leader Dr Russel Norman. “The Reserve Bank is in the final stages of implementing a system of managing bank failure called Open Bank Resolution. The scheme will put all bank depositors on the hook for bailing out their bank.

“Depositors will overnight have their savings shaved by the amount needed to keep the bank afloat. “While the details are still to be finalised, nearly all depositors will see their savings reduced by the same proportions.

more..
www.scoop.co.nz/stories/PA1303/S00306/national-planning-cyprus-style-solution-for-new-zealand.htm
Posted: 2 months, 1 week ago by Alexander Ac #6888
Hello Ilargi,

thanks for insights - but I do not really think that stealing xx % from peoples accounts could set-up the break-up of the Eurozone.

That is too far-fetched, IMHO. That said, if it will cascade into similar actions in bigger nations, EU might break-up, but I think that will not happen.

People are to apathic to bother. And most of them does not have savings, rather debt, I suppose, so why bother taking away few bucks from the wealthy?

Just thinking...

Cheers,

Alex

P.S. - You mean Nigel Farage?

Discuss this article
You need to log in or register to participate in this discussion.








 

Blog Archive

Powered by mod LCA


Stoneleigh Occupies:

 

Nicole Foss Lecture Tour:

AUSTRALIA/NEW ZEALAND March-June 2013


New Zealand May/June Dates still available


May 24 Waiheke Island
Palm Beach Hall 6.30pm

May 27 Auckland
The Hillsborough Room, The Fickling Centre (Mount Eden) 7.30pm

May 29 Tauranga
Baycourt 7.15pm

May 30 Wellington
Sustainability Trust, 2 Forresters Lane 5.30pm

June 1 Otaki
Clean Technology Centre 47 Miro St. 1.30pm


US Fall 2013 - Dates Available

Request Lectures: StoneleighTravels •at• gmail •dot• com.


Follow Us:


 
Get free email alerts for The Automatic Earth
Email:

You can support TAE by ordering all your Amazon purchases through this search box:



Google Translation